Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorMoe, Arild
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-24T10:48:30Z
dc.date.available2020-08-24T10:48:30Z
dc.date.created2020-08-19T15:49:46Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationThe Polar Journal. 2020, .
dc.identifier.issn2154-896X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2673590
dc.description.abstractThe 2013 NSR regime was explicitly aimed at attracting international users and transit shipping, but recent Russian policies point in a different direction. Expectations of a rapid increase in transit shipping have faded, whereas promoting the swift development of destination shipping serving large resource extraction projects has become a top political priority. Security concerns have become more pronounced, but have not impacted commercial shipping activity noticeably. There are tensions between the ambitions for increased output of minerals and the extensive protectionist measures which have been introduced, but, with one prominent exception, industrial stakeholders seem content with less-competitive shipping arrangements. The 2013 regulatory regime was designed to serve individual voyages. The new developments centre around large extractive projects with individual logistical solutions – including special conditions negotiated with the authorities. The NSR administration has undergone significant change, with a dominant role accorded to the state nuclear energy corporation Rosatom – itself engaged in commercial activities. The room for foreign shipping interests has shrunk, but not disappeared. Their opportunities will depend on alliances with key Russian players.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.urihttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/2154896X.2020.1799611
dc.subjectArktis
dc.subjectArctic
dc.subjectSkipsfartspolitikk
dc.subjectShipping policy
dc.subjectRussland
dc.subjectRussia
dc.titleA new Russian policy for the Northern sea route? State interests, key stakeholders and economic opportunities in changing times
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.description.versionpublishedVersion
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Statsvitenskap og organisasjonsteori: 240
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Political science and organisational theory: 240
dc.source.pagenumber19
dc.source.journalThe Polar Journal
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/2154896X.2020.1799611
dc.identifier.cristin1824124
dc.relation.projectFridtjof Nansens institutt: 469
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 287576
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel