Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSkjærseth, Jon Birger
dc.contributor.authorAndresen, Steinar E
dc.contributor.authorBang, Guri
dc.contributor.authorHeggelund, Gørild
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-28T07:20:58Z
dc.date.available2021-07-28T07:20:58Z
dc.date.created2021-02-23T19:57:05Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationInternational Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics. 2021, 21 (1), 1-15.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1567-9764
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2765443
dc.description.abstractThis article examines two important conditions for achieving the Paris Agreement’s (PA) ambitious goals. The first is the actions of the largest emitters ¬China, the European Union (EU) and the USA whose combined share of global emissions is near 50%. The second condition is the bottom–up design of the PA itself. Drawing on the policy mix literature and comparison of the three major emitters examined in this special feature (see Bang, Heggelund and Skjærseth), we first conclude that the EU has the most ambitious climate targets and policy mixes needed for achieving net zero emissions. Second, the PA has contributed to more ambitious targets and policy mixes mainly in the EU but also in China. Ambitious EU actors have actively invoked the PA goals to further their interests and legalize the Agreement’s dynamic five-year cycles. With Biden as president the USA will again be a party to the PA and is set to join the EU and China in upgrading ambitions. Looking towards the future, the USA and particularly China will have to, in one way or another, to follow the EU if net zero emissions are to be achieved. This may necessitate actual EU leadership by example.
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.titleThe Paris agreement and key actors’ domestic climate policy mixes: comparative patternsen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersion
dc.source.pagenumber1-15en_US
dc.source.volume21en_US
dc.source.journalInternational Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economicsen_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10784-021-09531-w
dc.identifier.cristin1892933
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 295704
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 308789
dc.relation.projectFridtjof Nansens institutt: 492
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 280960
dc.relation.projectFridtjof Nansens institutt: 481
dc.relation.projectFridtjof Nansens institutt: 456
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel